Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3451 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 125 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 18% better in Valheim than FX-8320 - 225 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
FPS
225
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.35/FPS
100%
Price, £
£303.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £303.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |