Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400F outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400F is 3360 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 21% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-8320 - 204 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.54/FPS
100%
Price, £
£110.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £110.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8320 | vs | Intel Core i5-12400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |