Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 231 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 125 vs 220 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8320 - 158 vs 157 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £523.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |