Key Differences
In short — FX-8320 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8320 is 377 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Performs up to 1% better in Minecraft than FX-8150 - 600 vs 597 FPS
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
AMD FX-8320 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Vishera | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
