Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600T outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600T is 3725 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600T
- Performs up to 25% better in No Man's Sky than FX-8300 - 197 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-13600T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8300 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 14 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.8 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
