Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2150 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 125 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-8150 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8150 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Zambezi | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
