Key Differences
In short — FX-6300 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6300 is 377 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than FX-8150 - 451 vs 450 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 95 vs 125 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
AMD FX-8150 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
