Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3172 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - £49.99 vs £388.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-12900F - £0.22 vs £1.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 33% better in Lost Ark than FX-6350 - 298 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Buy for £388 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |