Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2185 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - £39.99 vs £188.88
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6350 - 160 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76563 minutes ago
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76563 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |