Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 2080 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - £49.99 vs £168.88
- Up to 64% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-9600KF - £0.55 vs £1.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 21% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-6350 - 110 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.54/FPS
35%
Price, £
£168.88
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for £168.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |