Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-13100F - £39.99 vs £71.97
- Up to 40% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-13100F - £0.18 vs £0.3 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than FX-6350 - 239 vs 223 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 8 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
223
93.30543933054393%
Value, £/FPS
£0.18/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2545 minutes ago
Buy for £71.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2544 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Vishera | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |