Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3537 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X3D - £39.99 vs £382.99
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 42% better in Battlefield V than FX-6350 - 296 vs 209 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 120 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76570 minutes ago
Buy for £382.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76570 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 120 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |