Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-6350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 2626 days newer than the cheaper FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 91% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - £39.99 vs £470.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 4% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than FX-6350 - 185 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6350 - 24 vs 6 threads
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76753 minutes ago
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76753 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |