Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1282 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Forza Horizon 5 than FX-6200 - 164 vs 162 FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 51 vs 125 Watts
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Zambezi | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |