Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 2177 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 4% better in Deathloop than FX-6200 - 173 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raven Ridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |