Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 4110 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - £35.24 vs £565.54
- Up to 93% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-13900KS - £0.14 vs £1.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 95 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 16% better in F1 22 than FX-6100 - 289 vs 249 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 32 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.96/FPS
7%
Price, £
£565.54
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for £565.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 12th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 150 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |