Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 2084 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 95 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-6100 - 159 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 16 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i7-7820X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
