Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675C outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675C is 1311 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675C - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675C
- Performs up to 210% better in League of Legends than FX-6100 - 152 vs 49 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-5675C
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-5675C |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | May 15th, 2015 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Iris Pro Graphics 6200 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
