Buy on Amazon
£35.24
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400 is 3443 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i5-11400 - £35.24 vs £121.48
- Up to 67% better value when playing Fortnite than Core i5-11400 - £0.17 vs £0.52 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400
- Performs up to 10% better in Fortnite than FX-6100 - 233 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-Series FX-6100 CPU Used 6-Core 6-Thread Desktop Processor 3.3 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
233
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.52/FPS
32%
Price, £
£121.48
29%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-11400 (2.6 GHz / 4.4 GHz, 12M Cache)
Buy for £121.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i5-11400
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i5-11400 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 6 |
| 6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
