Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 3205 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £35.24 vs £180.63
- Up to 76% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £0.33 vs £1.38 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 24% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than FX-6100 - 131 vs 106 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6100 - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for £35.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.38/FPS
23%
Price, £
£180.63
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for £180.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |