Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1089
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1089
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 1128 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 125 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 27% better in Starfield than FX-4350 - 56 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i7-6900K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| FX | Collection | Core i7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
