Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 824 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - £59.97 vs £188.88
- Up to 67% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-6700K - £0.41 vs £1.24 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than FX-4350 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 27% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 91 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
Buy for £188.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 91 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |