Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 2878 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600 - £59.97 vs £237.41
- Up to 62% better value when playing Rust than Core i5-11600 - £0.39 vs £1.04 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 47% better in Rust than FX-4350 - 228 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
228
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.04/FPS
37%
Price, £
£237.41
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for £237.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |