Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 3438 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 146% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4350 - 582 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
237
40.72164948453608%
Value, £/FPS
£0.25/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |