Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is 2640 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - £59.97 vs £172.38
- Up to 62% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - £0.09 vs £0.24 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Performs up to 7% better in Rocket League than FX-4350 - 719 vs 674 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
674
93.7413073713491%
Value, £/FPS
£0.09/FPS
100%
Price, £
£59.97
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1608 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
719
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.24/FPS
37.5%
Price, £
£172.38
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for £172.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1608 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 6 |
No | Overclockable | No |