Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 981 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - £24.62 vs £128.88
- Up to 79% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-6700 - £0.21 vs £0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 12% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than FX-4300 - 130 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for £128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Vishera | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |