Buy on Amazon
£24.62
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 222 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - £24.62 vs £71.18
- Up to 63% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-4670K - £0.22 vs £0.59 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 9% better in Elden Ring than FX-4300 - 120 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 84 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Intel Core I5-4670K I5 4670K I5 4670 K 3.4 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread 84W 6M CPU Processor LGA 1150
Buy for £71.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
