Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 2828 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £24.62 vs £180.58
- Up to 79% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - £0.1 vs £0.47 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 63% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4300 - 384 vs 235 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £24.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
384
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.47/FPS
21%
Price, £
£180.58
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for £180.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |