Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3417 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 69% better in Counter-Strike 2 than FX-4130 - 391 vs 231 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
