Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1840 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1840 is 612 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Island 2 than FX-4130 - 119 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 53 vs 125 Watts
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Celeron G1840
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
