Key Differences
In short — FX-4130 outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4130 is 320 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | FX |
| Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
