Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7742 outperforms Core i5-4570R on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7742 is 2257 days newer than Core i5-4570R.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7742
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4570R - 125 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4570R - 128 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4570R
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7742 - 65 vs 225 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7742 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7742 | vs | Intel Core i5-4570R |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Rome | Codename | Crystal Well |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
64 | Cores | 4 |
128 | Threads | 4 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
225 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
22.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel Iris? Pro 5200 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |