Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms EPYC 7713 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 1029 days newer than EPYC 7713.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7713
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-14900HX - 128 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than EPYC 7713 - 208 vs 203 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7713 doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 15th, 2021
Single-Core
1617
57.70877944325482%
Multi-Core
15315
92.72826350205861%
AMD EPYC 7713 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
64 | Cores | 24 |
128 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
225 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |