Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600 is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 35% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 7551 - 216 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £244.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65766 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Single-Core
942
44.39208294062206%
Multi-Core
5942
72.56961406936982%
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |