Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551 outperforms Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551 is 1481 days newer than Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3250 - 229 vs 224 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 64 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Consumes up to 69% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 55 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Single-Core
532
56.475583864118896%
Multi-Core
1130
19.017165937394818%
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 2 |
64 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
180 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |