Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 1671 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-12100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than EPYC 7551 - 72 vs 51 FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 58 vs 180 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
72
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.15/FPS
100%
Price, £
£82.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £82.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 58 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |