Buy on Amazon
£170.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10300 outperforms EPYC 7551 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10300 is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 3% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than EPYC 7551 - 298 vs 288 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551 - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551 doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
298
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.57/FPS
100%
Price, £
£170.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for £170.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 126 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7551
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 180 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
