Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 50% better in New World than EPYC 7302P - 164 vs 109 FPS
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
164
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.12/FPS
100%
Price, £
£511.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £511.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
155 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |