Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms EPYC 7302P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 946 days older than EPYC 7302P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than EPYC 7302P - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Consumes up to 41% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 91 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
124
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.19/FPS
100%
Price, £
£147.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £147.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-7700K |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Rome | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 91 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |