Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 1436 days newer than Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 3% better in Borderlands 3 than Core i7-6700T - 220 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 35 vs 155 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302P doesn't have integrated graphics
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
