Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7302P outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7302P is 2291 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302P
- Performs up to 9% better in Valorant than FX-4350 - 745 vs 685 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD EPYC 7302P - 125 vs 155 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7302P
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302P | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| EPYC | Collection | FX |
| Rome | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 155 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
