Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms EPYC 7302 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 1147 days newer than EPYC 7302.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7302
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 155 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 11% better in Forza Horizon 5 than EPYC 7302 - 187 vs 169 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7302 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
187
100%
Value, £/FPS
£5.88/FPS
100%
Price, £
£1099.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £1,099.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7302 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
155 W | TDP | 170 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |