Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 1143 days newer than Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 3% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 74 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 32 vs 12 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
EPYC | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Rome | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |