Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Pentium Gold G5400T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 492 days newer than Pentium Gold G5400T.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Pentium Gold G5400T - 202 vs 193 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G5400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G5400T
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G5400T |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
EPYC | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |