Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7940HS outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7940HS is 1268 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than EPYC 7282 - 189 vs 183 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1248
50.526315789473685%
Multi-Core
9071
78.02339583691726%
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Rome | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | No |