Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 810 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-7940X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Athlon 3000G - 167 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 28 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i9-7940X
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
69.85401459854015%
Multi-Core
1975
19.903255063992745%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-7940X |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 28 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
