Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1268 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 5% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Athlon 3000G - 124 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i7-6800K
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
78.18627450980392%
Multi-Core
1975
34.887829005476064%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
| Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
