Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9500F outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9500F is 211 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9500F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9500F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9500F
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Athlon 3000G - 108 vs 99 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i5-9500F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i5-9500F |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
