Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2961 days newer than FX-8120.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-8120 - 131 vs 127 FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£60
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |