Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than FX-4300 - 166 vs 157 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-4300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4300 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Athlon | Collection | FX |
| Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
